Rebalancers
Process Overview
The rebalancing
problem occurs when a Rebalancers funds are spread across domains and need to be moved to different domains to support user activity and/or seize opportunities. However, the rebalancing process can be costly, manual, and complex where delays can lead to missed opportunities.
Rebalancers are often centralised exchanges, solvers, and market makers using Everclear to rebalance their funds across domains. By using Everclear’s netting system they will be able to cut their costs by up to 10x and reduce the complexity of the rebalancing process.
The rebalancing process is simplified to a single transaction: calling newIntent
on a Spoke contract from the origin domain with the amount and destination specified. Once this has been executed, the Rebalancer can wait for their intent to be netted with another and funds will be received on the destination domain in their wallet (or to a specified recipient).
The steps involved in the netting process are:
Rebalancer calls
newIntent
and funds are pulled from wallet to Spoke contractIntents are transported from Spoke to clearing chain periodically when the queue size is more than a threshold of items or the oldest item in the queue is more than threshold of minutes
Clearing chain receives intent and adds to deposit queue if it can be matched with an invoice OR adds intent to the invoice queue if there are no invoices to match with
Invoice and deposit queue is processed every epoch. Matched intents are added to the settlement queue and unmatched intents are added to the invoice queue
(Optional) If the intent is in the invoice queue for a whole epoch and is unmatched the netting auction discount begins to apply - discounting the invoice amount by a predefined BPS per epoch. This process repeats until the invoice is matched with a new intent (deposit).
The settlement queue is processed on the Hub and transported to the Spoke contract when the queue size is more than a threshold of item or the oldest item in the queue is more than threshold of minutes
Spoke contract receives SettlementMessage’s and either sends tokens or increases the virtual balance of the Rebalancer
Our estimates suggest 70% of intents will be matched with other Rebalancers in the netting system while the remaining 30% will be purchased by Arbitrageurs. For a detailed explanation of the matching process, discounts, fees, and settlement visit Protocol Mechanics section.
Rebalancers testing using our protocol are recommended to send intents with value exceeding $250 on L2s. If the intent can't be netted against other flows, this will ensure Arbitrageurs fill the order with a reasonable BPS discount which will more accurately represent outcomes when using the system.
Creating a new intent
As a Rebalancer, you will need to interact with the Spoke
contract on the origin domain to create a new intent that will be processed by the netting system.
newIntent
called on Spoke
contract
newIntent
called on Spoke
contractThe entry point to rebalance is newIntent
on the Spoke
contract of the origin domain. The destinations
field can be defined as a single item in an array if the Rebalancer wants to rebalance funds to a specific domain i.e. from OP to ARB. However, if the Rebalancer wants to rebalance to one of any domains they can provide a list and the system will rebalance to the domain that has the highest liquidity and lowest discoutn at settlement time.
The maxFee
field should always be specified as 0 as maxFee is only applicable in cases where an order should be routed to the solver pathway and does not apply to the netting pathway.
The ttl
input should always be specified as 0 to indicate the order should be routed via the netting system on the Hub. When ttl
is non-zero an order is routed via a separate solver pathway where the intent creator requires a dedicated solver to fill the intent for a fee. This pathway will not be supported at launch; Rebalancers must ensure all netting orders always specify ttl
as 0.
When the Spoke
contract completes the newIntent
call, the intent will be added to the intentQueue
, and periodically sent to the Hub
contract on the Clearing chain - depending on the configuration of the max queue size and age for the origin domain.
An intent can be created by interacting directly with the contract. The following is a simple example sending 100 USDT via the netting system from Sepolia Testnet to BNB Testnet - ttl
and maxFee
are specified as 0 to indicate the netting system should be used.
Domain Ids will correspond to standard chain Ids.
Monitoring Intents
The status of an intent can be fetched from the Subgraph which will update the intent on each domain as they are being processed. Rebalancers should be able to query the Subgraph using the intentId
to monitor the progress it has made through the system.
The intents created on the Spoke
contract will be added to the origin domain Subgraph as an OriginIntent
entity. The status of the purchase on the Hub domain will be added to the Subgraph as a HubIntent
entity. The settlement of the intent will be added to the destination domain Subgraph under IntentSettleEvent
entity.
There are 3 statuses used for OriginIntent
entities:
NONE: does not exist
ADDED: signifies added to the message queue
DISPATCHED: signifies the batch containing the message has been sent
There are 9 statuses used for HubIntent
entities:
NONE: does not exist
ADDED: intent has been added to the Hub
DEPOSIT_PROCESSED: has been added to the depositQueue
FILLED: deposit has purchased an invoice in the queue
COMPLETED: has been added to settlement queue on Hub
INVOICED: has been added to the invoiceQueue
SETTLED: settlement has been sent from Hub to Spoke
UNSUPPORTED: the asset is not supported on the origin/destination domains or the wrong output asset has been provided
UNSUPPORTED_RETURNED: the unsupported intent has been returned to the origin domain
The existence of the IntentSettleEvent
entity for an intentId on the destination chain implies it has been settled.
1 - Monitoring intent status
The Subgraph can be queried on the origin domain to pull information about the intent using the intentId
; Id will remain the same across the domains. Schema for OriginIntent
:
For example, if the origin domain Subgraph was being queried to fetch the status of an intent, it could be constructed as follows using its intentId
:
2 - Monitoring purchase status
The Subgraph on the Clearing chain (Hub) can be queried to pull information about the intent’s purchase status using the intentId
. Schema for HubIntent
:
For example, if the Hub domain Subgraph was queried to fetch the status of the intent, it could be constructed as follows using its intentId
:
3 - Monitoring settlement status
The Subgraph on the destination domain can be queried to pull information about the settlement using the intentId
. Schema for IntentSettledEvent
:
For example, if the destination domain Subgraph was queried to fetch the status of the settlement, it could be constructed as follows using its intentId
:
Last updated